In line with most definitions of ‘Europeanisation’ in the literature (see e.g. Börzel 2005
; Börzel and
Risse 2003
, 2007
; Cowles et al. 2001
; Falkner 2003; Featherstone and Radaelli 2003; Mair 2004;
Radaelli 2003), studies of the Europeanisation of candidate countries are primarily concerned with
analysing the EU’s impact on the domestic level in the candidates. Specifically, the key question that guides
these studies is to what extent and how the EU influences domestic political change in these
countries.
Concrete questions in particular theoretically informed studies display some variation. For example, such questions include:
Yet in essence, these guiding questions all boil down to one main question: under what conditions is the EU’s influence effective? Or, in other words: what factors explain variation in the EU’s influence across countries and issue areas? This question contains two parts. First, studies assess the extent to which the EU has a domestic impact, and second, they ask what factors account for this (lack of) impact, focusing on different EU strategies and mediating domestic factors.
The following two subsections review respectively the main questions that guide the literature with regard to the whether and how of the EU’s impact. They provide some indicative examples of studies that are guided by such questions but only review the different answers to these questions (with a more comprehensive indication of the relevant literature) in the Section 3 on ‘empirical findings’.
| http://www.livingreviews.org/lreg-2006-3 | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 Austria License. Problems/comments to |